The automotive landscape is rapidly evolving. Dealerships are brimming with 2013 and later vehicles boasting a wider array of engine technologies than ever before. From traditional gasoline fuel injection to advanced gasoline direct injection (GDI) and diverse hybrid systems, modern engines are marvels of engineering. A common thread uniting these advancements is sophisticated emission control systems, meticulously monitored by the Powertrain Control Module (PCM). As a seasoned auto repair expert at obd-de.com, I know firsthand that diagnosing and repairing these intricate systems will be a crucial part of vehicle maintenance in the years to come.
This evolution raises a critical question for technicians: Can generic OBD-II scan tools keep pace with these engine innovations, or will their diagnostic utility diminish? Since its inception, the generic OBD-II scan tool has been a cost-effective and invaluable asset, offering trained technicians deep insights into the PCM’s operations without requiring expensive enhanced scan tools. Losing this resource would be a significant setback for efficient diagnostics.
Fortunately, the answer is a resounding yes – the generic OBD-II scan tool is not only surviving but thriving. Consider diesel engines, for example. Recently, connecting a generic OBD-II scan tool to a 2012 Ford F-250 with a 6.7L diesel engine revealed over 70 data parameters, rich in diagnostic information. Beyond standard parameters like engine speed and MIL status, we observed FRP A CMD (fuel rail pressure command and actual), a suite of EGT sensors (EGT11 through 14), and DPF REGEN parameters – data previously exclusive to enhanced or OEM scan tools. This advancement is a boon for diesel technicians, proving OBD-II’s adaptability.
The expansion of OBD-II capabilities for diesel engines is driven by increasingly stringent emission regulations. With passenger car emissions already significantly reduced, diesel applications became the next frontier. In 1996, diesel-specific OBD-II parameters were limited, primarily focused on curbing visible black smoke from large trucks. However, with diesel passenger vehicle popularity surging – from approximately 5% of the fleet in 2007 to a projected 20% by 2020 – OBD-II regulations have adapted to stay relevant.
Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) engines represent another significant trend. GDI technology delivers impressive power from smaller engines. The 2012 Ford F-150 3.5L V6 twin-turbocharged GDI EcoBoost engine, producing 365 hp and 420 ft.-lbs. of torque, dwarfs the 2008 F-150’s 4.2L non-turbo V6, which offered 202 hp and 260 ft.-lbs. of torque. The performance benefits ensure GDI engine adoption will continue to grow.
Alt text: OBD2 data display from a Ford F-150 EcoBoost engine, highlighting standard parameters and the need for future OBD2 enhancements for turbocharger systems.
How is OBD-II adapting to GDI engines? Figure 1 illustrates data parameters from a 2012 Ford F-150 EcoBoost engine. While standard enhanced OBD-II parameters like throttle-by-wire and air/fuel ratio oxygen sensors are present, parameters related to the twin turbochargers or air management system are absent. This indicates OBD-II development needs to further address GDI-specific data in the future to provide comprehensive diagnostic capabilities for these advanced systems.
While OBD-II evolves, technicians must also adapt to leverage its full potential. When the Check Engine light illuminates, my first step is always generic OBD-II diagnostics. The initial data guides my subsequent diagnostic approach and tool selection.
For instance, if DTCs P0171 and P0174 (lean fuel mixture codes for banks 1 and 2) are present alongside excessive short-term and long-term fuel trim values in the generic data, an enhanced scan tool isn’t immediately necessary. The data clearly points towards a lean air/fuel mixture issue. The next steps involve investigating potential causes like vacuum leaks or fuel delivery problems. Tools like smoke machines for vacuum leak detection, fuel pressure gauges, or lab scopes with current probes for fuel pump analysis become crucial for verification.
Enhanced scan tools have their place, especially for deeper dives, but generic OBD-II data often suffices for initial diagnosis of common OBD-II codes.
Even after years of OBD-II experience, fuel trim interpretation remains a frequent topic. Let’s revisit key fuel trim principles.
Regardless of the driveability issue, short-term fuel trim (STFT) and long-term fuel trim (LTFT) are essential parameters to examine after oxygen sensors. Fuel trim acts as a window into the PCM’s fuel delivery adjustments and the effectiveness of its adaptive fuel strategy.
STFT and LTFT are percentages, ideally within ±10%. Positive percentages indicate the PCM is enriching the mixture to compensate for a lean condition, while negative percentages signal enleanment to counteract a rich condition. STFT fluctuates rapidly, whereas LTFT remains more stable. Values exceeding ±10% warrant further investigation.
When fuel trim falls outside acceptable ranges, assess whether the condition persists across different engine speeds. Check fuel trim at idle, 1500 rpm, and 2500 rpm. For example, if LTFT B1 is 25% at idle but corrects to 4% at higher RPMs, suspect a vacuum leak, which often manifests at idle. If the issue is consistent across all RPMs, fuel supply problems like a failing fuel pump or restricted injectors are more probable.
Fuel trim can also pinpoint problem cylinder banks in bank-to-bank fuel control systems. A significant difference between banks, such as LTFT B1 at +20% and LTFT B2 at +3%, directs attention to Bank 1-related issues.
Diesel engines differ in fuel trim parameter presentation. Instead of STFT/LTFT, you’ll find EQ RATIO B1 S1, reflecting the air/fuel mixture in Lambda format. 1.0 represents a stoichiometric 14.7:1 air/fuel ratio. Values below 1.0 indicate a rich mixture, above 1.0 a lean mixture.
Alt text: Enhanced OBD2 data from a Ford 6.7L diesel engine, illustrating individual fuel injector trim monitoring capabilities, not available in generic OBD2.
While generic OBD-II currently lacks injector-specific fuel trim for diesels, enhanced data, as shown in Figure 2 from a 2012 Ford 6.7L diesel, reveals the PCM’s capacity to monitor individual injector fuel trim. This data granularity may become integrated into future OBD-II generic standards as common rail diesel technology advances.
Another common technician concern is OBD-II data speed. However, optimizing data selection can significantly improve sampling rates. Figure 3 demonstrates this with oxygen sensor recordings.
Alt text: OBD2 data sampling speed comparison, showing faster and more detailed oxygen sensor readings when monitoring only two parameters versus 24 parameters.
Capturing 300 frames of data with 24 parameters (top graphs) took 525 seconds, a slow 1.75 seconds per frame. The oxygen sensor waveforms are visible but compressed. In contrast, capturing 300 frames focusing on only two oxygen sensor parameters (bottom graphs) took just 40 seconds, achieving 7.5 frames per second (0.13 seconds per frame). While not lab-scope speed, the increased resolution reveals significantly more detail.
My OBD-II data review always starts with oxygen sensors, followed by fuel trim, and then broader parameter groups. Selecting fewer parameters ensures optimal data sampling speed for focused diagnostics.
Permanent Diagnostic Trouble Codes are a valuable OBD-II addition. Introduced in 2010 and fully implemented by 2012 models, permanent DTCs indicate a current fault triggering the Check Engine light. Stored in non-volatile memory (NVRAM), they cannot be erased by simply clearing DTCs or reprogramming the PCM.
Permanent DTCs self-clear only when the PCM verifies the issue is resolved through internal tests. Figure 4 shows Health Check results from a 2010 Toyota Camry before and after a software update.
Alt text: Toyota Camry Health Check results demonstrating permanent DTCs remaining even after software update, highlighting the need for fault correction and drive cycles for clearing.
The initial Health Check (left) shows Permanent DTCs and a recommended software update. Post-update (right), the software calibration number changes, but the Permanent DTCs persist. Correcting the underlying fault and completing several drive cycles are necessary for permanent DTCs to clear.
In-Use Performance Tracking, accessible under Mode $09, another OBD-II enhancement phased in from 2005-2007, monitors OBD-II monitor run frequency during typical driving.
Alt text: In-Use Performance Tracking OBD2 data, illustrating monitor completion status and highlighting the Evap monitor as potentially difficult to complete.
Figure 5 shows an example. This data helps assess the effort required to complete monitors after DTC clearing. In this instance, most monitors should complete readily, but the evap monitor may be challenging, emphasizing the importance of understanding specific evap monitor completion procedures.
Standardization of Mode $06 data, primarily for CAN vehicles, has streamlined Mode $06 description accessibility, saving diagnostic time.
While data parameters are increasing, many technicians still primarily focus on common parameters like oxygen sensors, fuel trim, TPS, and ECT. Figure 1 highlights additional valuable parameters, especially when encountering unfamiliar vehicles.
When addressing a Check Engine light, I prioritize DIST MIL ON (Distance since MIL On) and DIST DTC CLR (Distance since DTC Clear). DIST DTC CLR, in particular, is a crucial parameter often overlooked, and directly relates to our focus keyword “Clr Dist Obd2”. Low mileage for DIST DTC CLR with a stored DTC suggests recent DTC clearing attempts. Conversely, a high DIST MIL ON mileage indicates prolonged Check Engine light operation. This parameter offers valuable insight into the vehicle’s diagnostic history and potential customer behavior regarding fault codes.
FUEL LEVEL is another useful parameter. Low fuel levels (below 15%) might suspend misfire testing, while high levels (above 85%) may inhibit evaporative emissions testing.
FUEL STAT 1 and 2 indicate fuel control status: Closed Loop, Open Loop, OLDRIVE (Open Loop Drive during wide-open throttle or coasting), OLFAULT (Open Loop due to OBD-II system fault), and CLFAULT (Closed Loop Fault, using only one oxygen sensor for fuel control). These parameters are particularly informative during road test recordings.
OBD-II has significantly advanced since 1996 and will continue to evolve alongside vehicle technology. Collaboration between manufacturers, regulators like CARB and EPA, and organizations like SAE is crucial for ongoing OBD-II improvement.
Next time a Check Engine light diagnosis is needed, leverage generic OBD-II capabilities first. You might be surprised how often simple, accurate generic data can expedite your diagnostic process and save valuable time.
Download PDF
